Executive Coaching A Profession of Transformational Outcomes Part 1 (Continued)

By Rick Forbus, Ph.D.

One client recently said to me that his series of coaching sessions afforded him opportunities to open up regarding his management team, his challenges with them and his leadership choices. In his case, feelings of isolation became prevailing at times. Because of the organizational structure, he did not really have peers to bounce things off of and his one report was inaccessible. The coaching sessions for him and for me became opportunities to energize thoughts, plans, and strategies and identify fears. Setting direction then became an act of strength and security, rather than, apprehension.

The website Fast Company, cites in another article, entitled, Coaching: The Fad that Won’t Go Away, by Jim Bolt (April 10, 2006) some more interesting comments regarding coaching.

“Our findings in my firm’s executive development surveys indicated a dramatic increase in the use of coaching: In 2004, 56% of the companies said that executive coaching would be a major learning method they would emphasize. Then in a 2006 follow-up survey, 51% said the use of coaching had actually increased. Given this nearly miraculous change in the status of coaching we recently decided, along with our research partner, Dr.Brian Underhill of Coach Source, to conduct a major research project to explore the murky world of executive coaching in depth.

Our study, High-Impact Executive Coaching, was unique in that it examined the topic in a 3-D manner, i.e.,t hrough the eyes of coaches, organizations that retain them, and leaders being coached. The study included 48 organizations and 86 leaders being coached. In this column I want to focus mostly on what we learned from the leaders being coached since it’s highly relevant for anyone interested in either providing coaches to leaders or in being coached.

What did we learn?

First, let’s clarify what we mean by ‘coaching.’ There are coaches for developing leadership skills, improving public speaking, managing transitions to overseas assignments, enhancing ‘executive presence,’ career coaches, life coaches, and coaches for just about everything else you can imagine. However, the vast majority of our respondents indicated ‘leader development’ to be the primary reason coaches were engaged. The biggest change is from coaching being used, as a ‘fix it tool’ for leaders with problems, to helping successful leaders get even better. In many firms, having a coach is seen as a badge of honor. And we found that coaching now reaches into the highest levels: 43% of CEOs and 71% of the senior executive team had worked with a coach.

And here’s the bottom-line: 63% of organizations say they plan to increase their use of coaching over the next five years. Most telling, 92% of leaders being coached say they plan to use a coach again. Both indicate strong endorsements of coaching; the first by the organizations paying the bills, and the second by the leaders who are actually receiving coaching.”

Several years ago an “informal” coach of mine asked me what was keeping me from making a significant shift in my future choices regarding my career. His questions that followed helped me dial in some ideas and some action steps. Also, since the coaching relationship was informal and very trustworthy, I had a sense of security and openness. His concern and questioning helped me find my own way. In this scenario he just asked open-ended questions which led me into a realm of self-discovery.

People will exceed targets they set themselves.   Gordon Dryden

In the 2011 Sherpa Executive Coaching Survey, there is a lot of good information supporting the fact that executive coaching and professional developmental training is on the rise. Also, the survey shares some clarity on the definitions surrounding the ever-emerging trade of executive coaching. It states; “Here’s a widely accepted definition of executive coaching:”

Executive coaching means regular meetings between a business leader and a trained facilitator, designed to produce positive changes in business behavior in a limited time frame.

This definition clarifies:

  • Who coaches are
  • What coaches do
  • When things happen

Or, we could say that executive coaches are:

  • Trained facilitators that
  • produce positive changes in business behavior
  • on a set schedule within a limited time frame.

The Sherpa article goes on to say,

“Executive coaches, as a general rule, do not share their own experience (as do mentors). Do not give advice (as do consultants). Do not impart specific knowledge (as trainers do). Avoid personal issues (the role of a counselor, therapist or life coach).”

These findings are somewhat similar to Trove’s delivery paradigm. The definition is right on target on the “whom,” how,” and “when.” However, we use a blend of styles to best serve our clients. For instance, it is not so rare to coach directly towards the professional goals of a client and a shift occurs to the direction of one of the abovementioned areas of concern like,  knowledge sharing, or, something personal. This holistic approach is a defining strength of Trove’s in the market. Coaching is certainly here to stay. As long as people desire leadership, management or life breakthroughs, coaching will be around.

Some years back, as it was forming, a movement by the International Coaching Federation (ICF) was afoot to define and standardize coaching. The ICF says this today:

The ICF defines coaching as partnering with clients in a thought-provoking and creative process that inspires them to maximize their personal and professional potential.

 I enjoy the fact that the ICF keeps high standards, sophisticated training and international transference in their mission. They also define this in their materials.

ICF is the largest worldwide resource for professional coaches, and the source for those who are seeking a coach. We are a nonprofit organization formed by individual members-professionals who practice coaching, including Executive Coaches, Leadership Coaches, Life Coaches and many more, from around the world. Formed in 1995, today the ICF is the leading global organization, with over 17,000 members, dedicated to advancing the coaching profession by setting high professional standards, providing independent certification, and building a network of credentialed coaches. We exist to support and advance the coaching profession through programs and standards supported by our members and to be an authoritative source on coaching information and research for the public.

 Many coaching certification schools and convocations define coaching similarly as the ICF. However, different applications of coaching skills will require other definitions and applications.

 Executive Coaching is a facilitative one-to-one, mutually designed relationship between a professional coach and a key contributor who has a powerful position in the organization…The coaching is contracted for the benefit of a client who is accountable for highly complex decisions with wide scope of impact on the organization and industry as a whole. The focus of the coaching is usually focused on organizational performance or development, but it may also serve a personal component as well. Summary findings from the International Executive Coaching Summit, October 1999, compiled by Lee Smith and Jeannine Sandstrom, and including information produced by 36 coaches.

 

Wasylyshyn, as so noted below, has some interesting ideas about executive coaching. As does Trove, Inc., she sees coaching as a holistic endeavor with considerations regarding the sustainability of the coaching relationship.

There are four methodological factors that distinguish the coaching of super-keepers from that ofother employees…These factors are: 1) holistic approach, 2) deep behavioral insight, 3) the active involvement of top corporate executives and 4) sustained relationships with the coach and/or trusted internal collaborator ‘usually a senior human resource professional).’Karol Wasylyshyn in “Coaching The Super-Keepers” a chapter from the book “The Talent Management Handbook: Creating Organizational Excellence By Identifying, Developing and Promoting Your Best People” September, 2003

In Part 2 of this article, I will bring to bear insights on techniques and outcome tracking as they relate to coaching. Every coach will be different and much of the success of a coaching arrangement will be the match of the coach’s behavioral platform, style, experience and the client’s. At Trove, Inc., we actually use assessments to better match client with coach. We ask our potential clients to take an assessment then we match our coaches’ scales and behavioral tendencies with the client. Also, of course, coaching experience and particular strengths of the coach are taken into account as we match coach to client.

Hopefully, this article gives you better clarity of the profession of coaching.


Leave a reply

 
 
PMI Logo1 Powered by PDUs2Go.com, Inc. | Copyright © 2007 - 2017, PDUs2Go.com, Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.

"PMBOK, PMI, PMP and REP" are trademarks, service marks or certification marks of the Project Management Institute Inc.
PDUs2Go.com Inc. | 3500 Lenox Road, Suite 1500 | Atlanta, GA 30326 | 404-815-4644